Is Fright Undermining Your Well-Being?

Fright has a sneaky way of getting into our heads. One moment we’re just a little unsure, and the next, our minds are running loops of worst-case scenarios. It happens to all of us. Something feels a bit off, and suddenly we’re imagining disasters. But take a step back—are things really that bad, or did we just get spooked?

Fright is that jolt, that moment of being startled. It feels urgent, but that doesn’t always mean it’s dangerous. Our ancestors needed that sort of vigilance. Life back then really was risky—a deep cut or broken bone could be a death sentence. The average person didn’t live past thirty. These days, in many parts of the world, we’re living past eighty. But our nervous systems haven’t quite caught up.

Instead, we still respond to the world as if it’s full of lurking tigers. Except now, the “tigers” are headlines, news alerts, and warnings about everything from our cholesterol to the state of the world. There’s always something, isn’t there? But remember, the media trades in fear because calm doesn’t sell. Good news? Too dull to make the front page.

The thing is, most of what frightens us is imagined—not rooted in real, present danger. Fright is emotional, while actual danger is something tangible. In truth, thanks to advances in medicine, safety standards, and technology, the world is safer than it’s ever been. Statistically, if you were only at risk from unnatural or accidental causes—not ageing—you could expect to live about 2,800 years. That’s how rare real threats are.

Of course, life still has its troubles. But letting fear run unchecked does more harm than good. It steals our sleep, clouds our thinking, and makes the world feel smaller than it is.

So, when anxiety creeps in, try to pause and ask, “Is this really a danger—or just a fright?” That little question can make all the difference. And if you’re looking for a good reality check, Hans Rosling’s Factfulness* is worth a read. It’s full of surprising truths about how much the world has improved—calm, factual, and strangely comforting.

Sometimes, the best antidote to fear is a bit of perspective.

*: Factfulness: Ten Reasons We're Wrong About the World - And Why Things Are Better Than You Think by Hans Rosling, Ola Rosling, Anna Rosling Rönnlund

Success, Habits, Failures and Learning

After years of watching learners, one thing stands out: people handle mistakes in very different ways. Some—more so in recent times—tend to hang back, only doing what’s asked, careful not to step out of line. They play it safe, sticking to the edges, afraid to get it wrong. Others dive in, give it a go, and get things mostly right—about seventy percent of the time.

And here’s the interesting bit: it’s those who try, even when thirty percent of what they do doesn’t quite land, who usually come out ahead when it really counts—grasping the first principles and the logic behind the task, not just the surface.

When we get something right, we feel good—confident, capable. We remember the answer and repeat it next time, often without thinking much about it. That’s how habits form. It’s useful, especially in the short term. But getting it right doesn’t always mean we understand it. Sometimes, it just means we’ve learned to repeat a pattern.

Mistakes, on the other hand, ask more of us. They interrupt us. They invite us to pause, get curious. What went wrong? Why didn’t it work? That’s where real learning begins—not just doing but understanding. As the saying goes: success breeds habit, failure breeds learning.

Personally, I enjoy tinkering with new ideas just to see where they lead. Most of the time, things go partly right—but not quite as expected. Still, those moments are full of insight. I ask myself, “What did I learn? What was the tweak that caused the unexpected result? What if I tried it again, slightly differently—what would happen then?”

That’s where the growth lives—in letting go of the need to be perfect. Failing fast and often can lead to stronger skills and better outcomes, if we stop chasing the right answer and start tuning into the process instead.

Of course, getting something right is worth a quiet celebration. But getting it wrong—if you’re really paying attention—can be even better. The real loss isn’t failure. It’s hesitation. Sitting on the sidelines means missing out on both habit and learning. In the end, all you build is the habit of holding back. And that’s the one habit that’s hardest to unlearn.

Eight Billion (8,000,000,000) Of Us

Today, there are approximately 8 billion people alive, with an estimated 110 billion ever having been born. While these numbers are fascinating on their own, they also offer valuable insights when viewed through the lens of probabilities and statistics.

Consider this: if today an event has a one-in-a-billion chance of happening to someone in 2025, that event will actually occur eight times this year. If that event has a one-in-a-million chance of happening each day, it will affect 2.9 million people this year. A one-in-a-trillion daily event will occur 125 times in 2025. This is the essence of probabilities—detached, factual, and often counterintuitive. Despite the clarity of statistical reasoning, human psychology makes it difficult for us to process large numbers and assess risk accurately. There are three key reasons for this:

1. Difficulty Comprehending Large and Small Numbers

Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman noted:

"Human beings cannot comprehend very large or very small numbers. It would be useful for us to acknowledge that fact."

We tend to overestimate rare but dangerous events while underestimating positive outcomes. For example, many people fear plane crashes more than car accidents, despite the latter being far more common and deadly. Similarly, we often overlook significant reductions in deaths from natural disasters due to advancements in preparedness and prevention and imagine we are more at risk today than in earlier times.

2. The Negativity Bias and Evolutionary Survival

Our natural tendency to be risk-averse is a survival mechanism. Historically, avoiding danger was crucial for survival, as infectious diseases, accidents, and predation posed significant threats.

For example, in 1900, approximately 800 per 100,000 Americans died annually from infectious diseases. By 2014, this number had dropped to just 46 per 100,000—a staggering 94% decline.*

Yet, our instinctual caution remains hardwired, often making us perceive the world as more dangerous than it actually is.

3. Media Amplification of Rare Events

The third problem is the over reporting of very low-frequency events. Until very recently (1950s), most news reporting was largely about local matters, with some regional and national events noted and almost none of an international nature. As the number of people in your “news” community was likely less than a few million, an event with a one-in-a-billion occurrence in your community was unlikely to happen, so you would never know if it had transpired elsewhere and would not imagine the possibility of such an occurrence. Since "if it bleeds, it leads," people are constantly exposed to extraordinary tragic but infrequent events, distorting their perception of risk. This creates a false impression that such events are far more common than they actually are, increasing fear and anxiety about the world.

A More Rational Approach to Risk

Understanding probability allows us to adopt a more balanced perspective on risk. While it is natural to feel cautious, recognizing that the world is statistically safer than ever can help reduce unnecessary fear. By focusing on data rather than emotion, we can make better decisions and embrace a more confident outlook on life.

So, the next time you hear about a rare but dramatic event, ask yourself: Is this truly a rising threat or just a reflection of our growing access to information or more likely situation that with eight billion people alive having eight billion daily experience that eight -in-a-billion event occurred today?

Letting go of exaggerated fears can empower you to experience the world with greater clarity, freedom and JOY

*Source: "Same as Ever: Timeless Lessons on Risk, Opportunity, and Living a Good Life" by Morgan Housel.  Well worth a read, full of commonsense in the battle against nonsense.

What is Thinking?

One day in primary school, there was a test—something they did back in the 60s. I was about ten, and the teacher posed the question, “What is the third request in the Lord’s Prayer?” Perhaps you know the answer, but that’s not really the point—test yourself if you like.

I was stumped. I felt insulted. I was angry at the teacher. Why? Because we hadn’t been asked to memorise the answer to this question. I felt like the teacher was cheating, breaking the unwritten learner-teacher contract. Their job was to tell me what to memorise, and my job was to memorise it.

After the test, but before the results were in, I stewed over this unfair, below-the-belt, unconstitutional conduct. It really got under my skin. Then the moment of reckoning came. The answer was, “Thy will be done.”

I mentally rehashed all the instruction we’d had on the Lord’s Prayer. We’d been forced to memorise it, recite it privately and as a class, write it down, and see it up on the blackboard. My word, had we memorised that material! I was practically an expert on the Lord’s Prayer at ten years old.

What amazed me was that if I’d just paused, re-ran the prayer in my mind, and counted on my fingers, the answer was right there in front of me. And that’s when it hit me—this was what thinking actually was. It was more than memorisation. It was what happens when you engage your mind and explore the uncertain mystery of whatever you are doing. And letting go of right answers.

I had met thought in school. Real thought. The kind that goes beyond the safe borders of what you’ve been taught and ventures into the unknown. And it was exciting. It was fun. It was totally personal and, dare I say, selfish? I was inside my own head. It was me. It was self-discovery in its rawest, most naive form.

That fascination with pondering stayed with me from the age of about ten, what a blessing. I became a thinking addict. Soon, I was perused the entire World Book encyclopaedia (a pre-Google, ancient summary of everything known to humankind at the time—about 20 volumes or roughly two metres of pages). I learned to channel my curiosity into something constructive, awesome and wonderful.

The rest, as they say, is history.

Epilogue: Sadly, sixty years later, and having been involved in university-level instruction for about forty years, I’ve seen that, unfortunately, a sizable minority of my learners have not had their “Eureka” moment—the realisation that they need to independently learn, ponder, engage and think. And with AI making thoughtfulness less necessary and easily outsourced, it feels like we are entering some very scary times.

Achievement and Your Calling

The notion of achievement has really got my fancy.  It seems to explain so much of my awesome life journey.  Somewhere in my early forties, my life fortunes seem to fall into place and stay that way. Particularly, achievement, engagement, purpose and calling joined up and my well-being almost permanently was improved.  Looking back, what brought all these circumstances together: it was achievement!

Sometime in my forties I began to enjoy significant career satisfaction: going to work was like going to play. The more time I was involved in my career, the more I enjoyed it.  I was in the FLOW for so many moments from when I left my home until I returned.  But what was it that brought such pleasure and purpose? It was the countless very small successes that happened every day.  Lectures became shows.  Learners were the audience.  The curriculum was the music and art.  Building lectures was my canvas.  Achievements were everywhere, and unconsciously many task I did become a chance to achieve and excel.  Even the most mundane task of marking exams became an art form where each script was an opportunity to impress me and let the learner shine.  Effort and talent were working together as a team. 

Purposeful opportunities were everywhere.  Encouraging my learners to understand better and more deeply became my educator goal.  Wondering why something made sense to me became a mystery adventure.  Imaging WHY became my mission statement.  My lectureship career became a calling.  The cycle of flourishing repeated itself and continues to this day.

I hope I don’t come across as boasting or proud, rather I am sharing the eureka of discovering why and how my calling evolved.  It was all about inventing baby step achievements such that the smallest task was a joy I savoured and a chance to do a little better. 

Many of us can harmonize our engagement, meaning (purpose), achievement and calling.  Want to upgrade your career to a calling? Use achievement as the catalyst.  Design micro achievement tasks and moments into your day and relish those successes.

Curious?!?

The world and what you and I know about it is changing at an alarming pace. What we were taught seems to be less relevant or timely with each passing day.  How does one stay ahead or on top of what is current or useful? Additionally, just behind us is artificial intelligence, which is challenging our employment prospects. The standard response is lifelong learning.  I agree that lifelong learning is a useful defensive measure, but what might be a more effective offensive strategy?

Let’s use my area of expertise, financial accounting, as an example.  When I was learning my trade in the 70’s one could largely master most of the body of knowledge with a reasonable degree of diligence.  When I taught it, things began to change as more and more issues were raised and addressed, in an increasingly complex world.  Specialists emerged, where previously there were few areas of specialist expertise. Now that approach is falling short for the generalists and the specialists, as there is just so much information and not enough time to absorb it all.

My suggestion when confronting the challenges of the knowledge explosion and artificial intelligence is to apply our uniquely human quality of CURIOUSITY to the situation.  We need to risk being truly curious about whatever newness we are confronting.  Rather than being trained and re-trained, we must become fully engaged in the marvel of whatever new or novel learning confronts us.

To me, curiosity is the blending together of at least eight of the ten positive emotions being joy, savouring (remembering), interest, hope, amusement, inspiration, love and awe, applied to our area of expertise and life more generally.  Learning and knowledge growth is most effective when one is joyfully and actively engaged. Being curious means investing in order to grow and internally prosper. Artificial Intelligence will never be able to beat us on emotional curiosity.

Let’s use our “curiosity” advantage to our advantage.

DON’T QUIT OR SEND THAT!

Imagine you’ve just had an unfortunate experience and you are very discouraged by it.  You want to quit whatever because at this moment it is just too much.  Or someone did something that really aggravated you and you are fuming with anger.  You write a really angry and poisonous email to vent your frustration.  You seriously think about quitting or sending the email.

Can I make a suggestion which I wish I had followed when I was feeling like that?  DON’T QUIT ON A BAD DAY.  SEND THAT EMAIL TOMORROW, AFTER YOU’VE RE-READ IT AND HAVE COOLED DOWN.

Making serious decisions requires reflection and pause.  These are not fast thinking, spur of the moment reflexes that need an immediate response. Be very mindful that reactions can have significant lingering consequences, as they often cannot be easily reversed.  Once you QUIT or hit SEND that is it.  The dust and fallout will settle where it may, and that may not be a good resting place.

I know it is very difficult to pause at these trying moments but PAUSE you MUST!  You are emotionally charged and eager to do something, but should you?  Rarely are these trying occasions dangerous or life threatening so there is no urgency to act decisively or firmly.  This is not a LET GO moment, but a CHILL or REFRAMING opportunity.

From my experience, not quitting or hitting SEND was a God sent relief.  Things were not as bad as I imagined, it was just my imagination getting ahead of me.  And that email, it could have become a CLM (Career Limiting Move), or required some serious back tracking to get out that mess.

When the going gets weird, reframe that moment with a big STOP sign.  Have you got the facts straight?  Is your rage helpful or harmful? What will tomorrow look like if I quit or offend that other party? 

I am not suggesting that you give in or accept an unfair situation.  Rather I am clearly suggesting that before you do something extreme you carefully consider if you have a (better) Plan B option. Be careful, you might just get what you ask for!

 Reflection Source: www.Smallercup.org

Please share freely and widely, there are no copyright concerns.

SEEING THINGS IN BLACK AND WHITE

Black and white, Yes/No, Zero/One, binary logic assumes that there are absolute solutions or answers to many of life’s riddles.  Ambiguity is unnecessary and unwelcome.  Debating, discussing or pondering complex issues seems to be politically incorrect and unwelcome at times.

There appears to be a ‘politically correct’ answer to many of the troubling challenges society is facing.  People sometimes refuse to express their opinions because they believe they are ‘not allowed to say or think that’ in public.  Between identity politics and populism, the boundaries of critical thinking and inquiry are being reduced, and scope for intolerance increased.

Are most issues where others differ that simple? Are there no trade-offs where others might see things differently?  Are their priorities universal?  Are their lenses and perceptions complete, correct or necessarily relevant? What happened to complexity, lateral thinking, compromise  and “I beg to differ” legitimacy?

Black and white logic is quick and with like-minded colleagues, effective for team and friendship building.  However, binary thinking often comes at the expense of tolerance, inclusiveness, critical thinking, liberal democracy and a civil society.  Maybe both sides are correct, but for different reasons and to different degrees.

What I am petitioning for is tolerance, inclusiveness and compromise.  If you want any semblance of peace and wellness in your life you will need to let go of being right or better than others.  Enjoy diversity of opinion.  See what you can learn from others’ perspectives.  Remember, if you mix black and white together you get grey, which is generally the equitable solution to most complicated dilemmas.

 Reflection Source: www.smallercup.org

Please freely share and widely, there are no copyright concerns

THE FIVE-MINUTE ETHICS COURSE

I will never forget one particular learning experience:  a learner (student) in my course taught me a method to test whether an action was ethical or not, all in under five minutes.  I have experimented with the system he taught me, and it seems pretty much bullet proof. 

If you are confronted with an ethical dilemma and your answer is a confident YES TO ALL THREE of these questions, it is highly likely that what you are contemplating IS ETHICAL.  If one answer is a NO, then you are likely offside.

First, apply the Golden-Rule Test, which is: Do unto others as you would have others do unto you. (Or the Confucian form which is: Don’t do unto others as you would not have others do unto you.)  If someone did what you are considering to you would you be offended, harmed or displeased?  Reciprocity or tit-for-tat is an essential test for much of our behaviour.

Second, the Role-Model Test, which is:  If you were a parent would you want your child to do what you are considering?  Would you want to set this action up as an example which your offspring would follow and consider “normal”? Is this the type of role modeling you want to promote?

Third, the Front-Page Test, which is: If you had editorial privilege and the entire front page of the newspaper, could you fully explain and justify your action to an objective, informed and diligent reader?  By definition, ethical dilemmas are complex, full of contextual details and awkward trade-offs.  Would a thoughtful and independent observer, after evaluating the full circumstance of your situation, decide in your favour, or at least give you the benefit of the doubt? 

I have shared these tests with many and pondered them, appraising situations I have heard about or experienced through their lens. I would recommend this five-minute ethics course as highly effective, and a good primer for life.  It is simple enough to teach young children, and robust enough to guide seasoned professionals.

Reflection Source: www.Smallercup.org

Please share freely and widely, there are no copyright concerns.

MAKING HELPFUL AND HOPEFUL COMPARISONS

Comparing yourself to others often breeds jealousy and/or a sense of disappointment.  There will ALWAYS be someone with a better, bigger, newer, shinier, smarter, richer, faster or flashier whatever.  At best you may win the comparison contest for a few weeks before you are topped or your achievement, if compared to others, loses its merit, interest or bragging rights.

However, comparisons can also be very constructive as they motivate us to seek to improve ourselves and our situation.  We look around and speculate how we can make for a better tomorrow.  Much of this forward thinking is based on comparing what is to what might be; looking for a fix or improvement to our current situation. If there was no better or worse outcome, nothing would be worth doing.*

So, how can you make the process of comparison helpful and work for you? It comes down to what is the standard or base you use when you make comparisons.  Is it reasonably achievable or unrealistic? Related or unrelated to your personal strengths?

The Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson came up with a simple and effective rule, being: “Compare yourself to who you were yesterday, not to who someone else is today”.* Looking at the comparison process this way provides some practical guide.  Letting go of others in the comparison game makes the possibility of successful improvement highly achievable, as you become your own standard. 

So how can you make comparison helpful and hopeful?  Decide on what aspects of yourself to focus on for improvement by asking: “What is the better version of yourself you want?”  What are those personal attributes that you are likely to succeed at bettering?  Set low and readily achievable targets and slowly up your game.  Observe and appreciate your personal improvement over time.   Make the rewards for progress intrinsic and personally satisfying.  Look at your yesterday and note how your today is in a minor way better.

Letting go of others in the comparison process is an effective way to focus on yourself and your journey.  Get rid of the disquieting self-doubt and jealousy that others unhelpfully introduce into your self-improvement challenge.

Reflection Source:  www.Smallercup.org

Please share freely and widely, there are no copyright concerns.

*:  Jordan B. Peterson, 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos, (Penguin Books, 2018)

BEING IN THE ZONE or FLOW

We have all been in the flow** and relish these moments.  This is where one is engaged in an activity which is both high in challenge but matched with a high level of personal skill.  Awareness of time disappears, one is totally absorbed in the task at hand and in a state of peace, joy and total presence in the moment.  In sports, the experience of flow is described as being “in the zone”.   The importance of having a high degree of personal control over your circumstance makes the flow that much more authentic. By contrast, the opposite of flow is apathy or boredom, where one is using few of one’s skills, and the level of task challenge is low, with generally limited autonomy.

There are challenges to being in the flow, and they can be overcome.  A good place to start is to appreciate the importance of deliberately combining high levels of challenge and skill together.  The synergy of skill and challenge can motivate you to design part of your career or leisure time to allow for more flow situations. 

Creatively and carefully look at your job or leisure time and consider where there are opportunities to develop new skills or challenging opportunities.  Look at some of your more frequent but boring or less satisfying obligations and see if they can be re-engineered to being more skillful or challenging.  I disliked the exams marking aspect of university lecturing.  Subsequently I re-engineered the exam papers, questions, answer booklets, grade allocation/calibration, marking pens, marking space and workspace arrangement such that grading was more skillful and properly challenging (though never a joy).  Also see where there are opportunities for increased autonomy and design activities for skill improvement and challenge.

The awesome thing about flow is that by deliberately embedding it into your daily rituals, your occupational and intellectual well-being improves (two of the seven aspects of wellness).  

 **: Mihály Csíkszentmihályi coined and researched flow extensively.  The TedTalk video noted below provides more details on flow:

www.ted.com/talks/mihaly_csikszentmihalyi_on_flow?language=af

Reflection Source: www.Smallercup.org

Please freely share and widely, there are no copyright concerns.

ASK YOUR FRIENDS WHO YOU ARE

Often we are the last one to really know what is going on in our life. We may be sad, lost, less fit or a chore to be around but we don’t really know or believe it. But our friends and associates certainly do.

One especially useful time to involve others in your journey is when you are making career, retirement or finding our purpose dilemmas. We think we know what we like or want but by design we are biased and subjective. Your friend may be biased in that they like you but more importantly they see you as you are and behave. What they see is your strengths and weakness as they have had to adjust and accept them. Friends see what you are better or worse at because they can see how others reacted to your actions.

Bob Buford* described the process of discovering who you are by asking friends as seismic testing; where you allow others to drill into your personality and tell you what they observe and have discovered. These other set of eyes and hearts can be especially telling. Remembering these are friends and they are looking out for your well-being, they are certain to focus more on your abilities and steer you away from folly. Their precise insights may confirm or refute your plans, but at the very less their comments should be considered carefully.

Wonderfully, personal seismic testing let you know how others observe the consequences of your actions.

Asking questions such as “What do you (your friend):

“think I am especially effective (ineffective) at?”

“observe from the reactions of others that I do well (poorly)?”

“consider to be some of my more useful (weak) technical skills?”

“think I would be especially good at doing?”

“recommend would be the wisest new skill I develop to master my strengths (or tame my weaknesses)?”

“wish I would just stop doing as it is especially annoying to others?”*

Asking close friends how you actually come across is useful advice when you are looking for direction and purpose. They likely know a lot more about you than you imagine. And do listen carefully to what they say and observe, it may be positively inspiring.

*Half Time, Moving from Success to Signifance by Bob Buford

Reflection Source: www.Smallercup.org

Please freely share and widely, there are no copyright concerns.

Student or Learner?

I have taught in a university environment for over thirty years, so I have seen a lot of students and learners. What I have concluded over all these years is that students study and learners learn. 

 In my experience, those who study memorize, re-perform, cram and try to second guess the exam. They often fail to engage with the more intriguing and less easily accessed aspects of the topic.

 Learners learn by pondering, questions, engaging, visiting the theory and the rich “WHYNESS” of the materials. It goes without saying that they get a lot more out of the course.

 It is very easy to differentiate between learners and students.  Learners come to class and life prepared, having invested some time in advance to plan, and they try to understand the nature of the problem or topic under consideration.  Conversely, students in school and life often avoid preparation, fuss about unimportant tangential details, are averse to ambiguity and intimidated by reflection. They are convinced there is a magic bullet, a short cut or trick to success, and they avoid engagement with the complexities of an issue.

 As in the classroom, so in life. For the student of life, as the problem gets more complicated and rife with unpleasant trade-offs, they often seek simple black and white solutions.  The learners of life appreciate that interesting challenges are not black and white, there are better but not right solutions, and an understanding the underlying issues behind a problem may yield some interesting insights that will help to ultimately resolve it.

 Life and learning is not fair or kind: learners tend to have higher employment satisfaction and remuneration. Their preparedness and more thoughtful approach pays off. Learning also connects us with our more positive emotions, ultimately improving our well-being as we lose ourselves in the sheer joy of exploring something new.

 Reflection Source: www.Smallercup.org

Please freely share and widely, there are no copyright concerns.

No Sunk Costs

One of the more obvious truisms in economics is the fact that past actions are irrelevant in terms of making choices about what one might do today.  These past decisions are called SUNK COST; being that they are sunk and cannot be reversed, recovered, or revised; what has happened cannot be changed, they are forever sunk.  Whereas the economic and logical truth of the irrelevance of sunk cost and past choices is irrefutable, our emotional attachment to our past and unwillingness to let go of it is often overwhelming.

For example, countless times I have advised and observed learners who seriously dislike accountancy in all its form. When I confront them about their distain and how they ought to pursue a different major and career, the restrain is usual, “I cannot change focus, I have been studying accountancy for three or four years.”  Invariably they graduate with their accountant degree and an adequate grade, and later perhaps a professional designation, but there never was an accountant inside.  They win the education/career battle but lost the education/career war.

Consider what following story by Jason Zweig, a Wall Street Journal investment columnist while he was working with psychologist Daniel Kahneman on writing his book Thinking, Fast and Slow. Zweig tells a story about a personality quirk of Kahneman’s that served him well:

Nothing amazed me more about Danny than his ability to detonate what we had just done,” Zweig wrote. He and Kahneman could work endlessly on a chapter, but: The next thing you know, Kahneman sends a version so utterly transformed that it is unrecognizable: It begins differently, it ends differently, it incorporates anecdotes and evidence you never would have thought of, it draws on research that you’ve never heard of. “When I asked Danny how he could start again as if we had never written an earlier draft,” Zweig continued, “he said the words I’ve never forgotten: ‘I have no sunk costs.’” Sunk costs—anchoring decisions to past efforts that can’t be refunded—are a devil in a world where people change over time. They make our future selves’ prisoners to our past, different, selves. It’s the equivalent of a stranger making major life decisions for you.*

What are your sunk costs that are hindering your progress?  What is it that is time to let go of and move on from?

Reflection Source: www.Smallercup.org

Please freely share and widely, there are no copyright concerns.

*: The Psychology of Money: Timeless lessons on wealth, greed, and happiness by Morgan Housel

DOOMSCROLLING

Do you ever find yourself following a news topic on the internet that has unsettling overtones?  At the start of the Covid crisis, I found myself doing just this. Unfortunately, the news cycle profits from promoting troubling topics.  Our curiosity is twigged by the unusual or traumatic, and sometimes others’ misfortune gives us comfort and a sense of shared misery if we are feeling hard done by. 

 News has become a form of entertainment, where someone else’s tragedy or circumstances become interesting, but without the engagement of our empathy or compassion. We can read it and move on.  Often these articles can generalise and rely on poor statistical extrapolation.  Remote and one-off occurrences can seem frightening and more likely to happen to us than is really likely: they become an exaggerated risk to us, as part of a human population of over eight billion. 

 I have just learned recently that this is called doomscrolling* or doomsurfing.   Doomscrolling refers to the tendency to surf or scroll through bad news, even though that news is saddening, disheartening, or depressing.  Eventually doomscrolling can lead to heightened levels of anxiety and a distorted sense of reality. If we are not careful, we can find ourselves doing this late in the evening, and then it can start to affect our dreams and our sleep. 

 What intrigued me about my own doomscrolling was that when looking at the same topic from different news sources it suggested that there were parallel universes at play: the same event can be reported very differently by different  news sources.  Not only was my doomsurfing unsettling, but I was becoming a pawn in a divisive ideological battle over the truth.  Complex issues were reduced to the least number of variables, and only those facts that suited a particular narrative were presented.

 How do you manage web surfing and scrolling to control the doom dimension?  To begin, acknowledge that you are doing it, and manage this addiction at the start by doing it less frequently.  Next, de-couple from the internet thirty minutes before going to bed.  Leave your smart device outside the bedroom.  Deliberately choose the issues you follow and news sources you use.  Most importantly, acknowledge your keenness to dwell on the doom and gloom and look for alternative uplifting news.  Perhaps you can use Judge Earl Warren’s suggestion as a  doomscrolling guide:

 I turn to the sports page first, which records people’s accomplishments.  The front page has nothing but man’s failures.

 *: The Macquarie Dictionary as the 2020 Committee's Choice Word of the Year.

Reflection Source: www.Smallercup.org

Please share freely and widely, there are no copyright concerns.

PRAISING OTHERS

Praising others, and being praised by others, improves our well-being.  I was not aware until recently that there is hard science* confirming this. Research can now give advice on how to make praise more effective and reduce its potential unhelpful side effects. Many a primary school teacher likely knows this: 

It is more effective and constructive to praise a learner’s effort than the result of their effort.

But I’m not  primary teacher, so I found this suggestion profound, and certainly true for myself.  If someone praises my finished product, yes it does feel good, but the half-life of the compliment is short.  When the effort, skill, diligence, problem solving or determination is acknowledged, not only do I feel pleased, but a more subtle pride ensues which lingers for a long time.  The effort that created the successful outcome can be replicated in other circumstances and endeavors – it is the skill that is transferable, rather than the content. Effort based praise empowers transferable skills. Focusing too much on the result of the effort can undermine the willingness to try again, and too much praise can backfire if handed out too freely.

Praise works both ways, for the person being honored and the person doing the honoring to feel more joyful. Why, despite its wellness benefit, do we seem to largely reserve praise for the young and by adulthood, give it out only occasionally?  We seem to have replaced praise with criticism: being judgmental instead as if those concerned should know better.  Is it because it takes more to impress us? Are we reluctant to see excellence? Regardless, rationing praise and reserving it for the young isn’t helpful or useful.

If effort is the catalyst for successful outcomes, perhaps it is time to re-visit and acknowledge the successful actions of others, including our peers.  It might be helpful to get into the habit of lightening up our expectations and admiring other’s efforts more.
Reflection Source: www.Smallercup.org

Please share freely and widely, there are no copyright concerns.

*: “Self-discipline Outdoes IQ in Predicting Academic Performance of Adolescents” , Duckworth, A.L. and M. Seligman, Psychological Science 16 (2005): 939-44

“Praise for Intelligence Can Undermine Children’s Motivation and Performance”, Mueller, C.M. and C.S. Dweck, J Personal and Social Psychology, 75, no.1 (1998); 33-52

THE ORGANIZED MIND*

After reading  The Organized Mind,* what did I learn?  Not a lot, unfortunately, but can I share a few simple truths from this well-researched text on brain science? 

 Mental health and wellness all rely on a healthier and happier brain.  Ignoring brain wellness will impair your well-being.

 Not surprisingly, our brain is lazy and is looking for easy solutions and rules to make its job less stressful, yet successful.  Our successful brain is largely designed for the hunting and gathering activities of our primate fore-parents of 50,000 plus years ago. Three things mattered then: survival, using the least amount of calories possible and passing on the genes to the next generation.  Likely your goals are a little more aspirational, but our brain functions largely according to this simplistic set of guiding principles.

 Our brain really does not like stress: over-complexity seriously undermines its effectiveness and efficiency. Where possible outsource (externalize) memory or attention. We really do have a one track mind: multitasking and multi-attention is an impossibility.  Trying to do or remember several things simultaneously puts the brain into alarm mode.  The solution is simple.  Prioritized lists  solve most of these stresses to the brain.  By writing something down, the brain does not have to remember it, and by prioritizing the list the need to multi-task is materially reduced. The book and research suggest a simple prioritization scheme: Do it, Delegate it, Defer it, or Drop it It took over fifty pages to provide the science behind these essential and obvious observations!

 The most interesting conclusions in the book were about sleep.  A tired brain is problematic and often unhelpful.  Not getting your rapid eye movement (REM)  sleep can have serious negative consequences.  For best results you need 1.5 hours of REM per night.  What was interesting is that you cannot cram or double up on REM sleep.  If you don’t get your dose one night, you cannot make it up the next evening.  Sleeping in doesn’t recover the deficit or build a surplus.  The most important strategy was to get into a regular sleeping schedule of 8 hours (+/- 1 hour) a day: neither over nor under sleeping alters your underlying REM diet.  Alcohol and drugs interfere with REM: you may fall asleep quicker, but your REM could be on hold.

 A healthier brain does not guarantee wellbeing, but an ill brain certainly reduces it.

 Reflection Source: www.Smallercup.org

Please share freely and widely, there are no copyright concerns.

*: The Organized Mind, Thinking Straight in the Age of Information Overload by Daniel Levitin

COURAGE

The pandemic has brought to my attention how differently individuals have reacted to the risks associated with Covid.  At one end there are those that have taken the idea of social distancing to the extreme.  A sense of anxiousness envelops them.  Some others have an almost, ”What’s the problem?” perspective.  Indifference describes them. And somewhere in-between most of us sit. Our reactions display different levels of anxiety and fear. Or posed another way, how much courage you have.

It is worth noting that you cannot be courageous unless you are also afraid: courage is about how you handle being frightened. Courage is not allowing fear to rule your decisions.  Courage is about how you deal with uncertainty; do you run away or carefully consider the odds and alternatives and make an informed confident decision accordingly.

A world that does not require courage would be a world where nothing changes: a place of  total certainty, no surprises, no mystery or adventure. There is no correct reaction to the challenges, but life outcomes are materially influenced by your “courage choices.”

The brain does not fully develop the part that manages risk taking until your late teens.  One reason suggested is that being more fearless and courageous as a youngster gives us boundaries as to what works and what doesn’t.  Later, when we become parents, this helps us provide saver environments for our own children.  An important part of maturity is the lessons learned from your successful and unsuccessful life experiments and experiences of your youth.

How do you cope with fearful situations?   Do you default to being afraid, or push to expand your comfort zone and sense of adventure?  May I suggest being continuously more courageous is the way to go, but one step-at-a-time. Remember to learn from your successes and failures, don’t repeat your disappointments and adjust your risk-taking accordingly.

Note: Please get vaccinated: it is good for others (and yourself).

Reflection Source: www.Smallercup.org

Please share freely and widely, there are no copyright concerns.

DO THINGS FOR THE RIGHT REASONS

Why do I do what I do when I do what I do?  We see a focus on the quick pay-off, hit-and-run motivation driving so much of our life.  Do whatever, bill the client, get a jolt of pleasure and ignore whether there is a higher purpose to our existence.  Do I ask whether my conduct is proper in the long run?  Is what I do helpful for humanity? My soul? My community? 

I would argue that putting money, success or a moment of pleasure before wellness is a formula for disappointment and underachievement.  Much better to do things for noble reasons.  The fruit of this will certainly be a more positive sense of self and purpose.

Fortunately, or unfortunately, you reap what you sow.   When we only concern ourselves with the short term, we get an immediate but non-sustainable bit of joy.  Before you do something, speculate whether it is good for your longer-term goals.  If yes, you will likely be rewarded with a more joyful and purposeful future. 

I have also been so fortunate to teach students who became extremely successful in their chosen career.  What distinguished them way back when I first encountered them was that they were fascinated and excited with commerce.  They sought out their career for the right reason; it empowered and inspired them and now they are respected leaders in their communities.

Doing things for short term benefits is largely a zero-sum strategy. You get back an amount equal to what you give up.  Do things for less noble reasons and you may get a short term pay-off, but in the longer term your reputation for integrity and honesty may be challenged.

Do things because it is good for others, the environment, or for a higher purpose. Over an extended period one of the most prized benefits will emerge, a good reputation.  Others will see you as someone with integrity, someone they trust, want to do business with and be with.

Regularly consider whether your actions will improve or undermine your reputation. If your reputation is improved, your well-being will also flourish.

Reflection Source: www.Smallercup.org

Please share freely and widely, there are no copyright concerns.

BEING A BETTER YOU

Seven independent themes in the self-improvement literature are listed below:

          I.            Be the best version of yourself that you can be.

        II.            Only compare yourself to your yesterday.

     III.            Go with your strengths, manage your weaknesses.

     IV.            Be kind to yourself.

       V.            Strive to be 0.1% better every day.

     VI.            Acknowledge and savour your successes.

  VII.            What gets measured or observed gets done.

VIII.            Risk excellence.

I have not seen these suggestions combined, but taken together they are an excellent strategy for self-improvement:

To put this process into action, start by making an inventory of both your strengths and your weaknesses. Be honest and blunt about yourself, as none of us are either perfect or totally imperfect.  Next, select one or two of the weaknesses that are hampering you from becoming a better person.  For example, I decided to focus on being more patient and less prone to being frustrated.  Then, mindfully monitor your thoughts and actions. 

Compare your progress in managing your weaknesses.  Expect setbacks but also progress.  After a few weeks, change tact, and select one or two of your redeeming qualities which can also be improved and increase the frequency that you express them. Ultimately it is always better to lead with your strengths and manage your weaknesses. Interestingly, when you change your focus, the earlier targets still get attention in your sub-conscious self.  Shaking things up accelerates becoming a better version of you.

Please be kind to yourself.  That’s where the 0.1% daily improvement goal comes into play.  Whereas 0.1% sound small, that is precisely the point.  Being a better you is a  continuous improvement project, played out over a lifetime.  Small, baby steps do make huge differences in a relatively short period of time.  At 0.1% daily improvement, after a year you are a 40% better version of yourself; that is serious progress!

Finally, please acknowledge your progress.  This encourages you to keep on track and set new goals and expectations.  What get measures or observed gets done;  and what you do not recognize tends to lapse.  If you ignore your effort, it may only be a short matter of time before your “better you” project fails.

Being the best version of you is a project well worth investing in.  The rewards for you and your acquaintances will be significant. Risk excellence!

 Reflection Source: www.smallercup.org

Please share freely and widely, there are no copyright concerns